Recent Advancements in
Periodontal Drug Delivery Systems
Gaurav Tiwari2*, 1Ruchi
Tiwari1 and Awani K. Rai1 Vachaspati Dubey, Anil Sharma3,
Pranay Wal1 and Ankita
Wal1
1Department of Pharmaceutics, Pranveer Singh Institute of Technology, Kalpi
Road, Bhauti, Kanpur 208020, (Uttar Pradesh), India
2Jaipur National University, Jagatpura, Jaipur, Rajasthan
3Gyan Vihar
University, Jaipur, Rajasthan
ABSTRACT:
Advances
in understanding the etiology, epidemiology and microbiology of periodontal
pocket flora have revolutionised the therapeutic
strategies for the management of periodontal disease progression. The rationale
for use of antibiotics in periodontal therapy is based on the concept that
bacteria are the primary cause of periodontal diseases and thus treatment
should be directed towards controlling the bacterial flora.. The effectiveness of mechanical debridement of plaque and
repeated topical and systemic administration of antibacterial agents are
limited due to the lack of accessibility to periodontopathic
organisms in the periodontal pocket. Systemic administration of drugs leads to
therapeutic concentrations at the site of infection, but for short periods of
time, forcing repeated dosing for longer periods. Local delivery of
antimicrobials has been investigated for the possibility of overcoming the
limitations of conventional therapy. The use of sustained release formulations
to deliver antibacterials to the site of infection
(periodontal pocket) has recently gained interest. This review summarises the recent developments in the field of
intra-pocket drug delivery systems and identifies areas where further research
may lead to a clinically effective intra-pocket delivery system.
KEYWORDS:
INTRODUCTION:
Periodontal
disease is a collective term ascribed to several pathological conditions
characterized by degeneration and inflammation of gums, periodontal ligaments,
alveolar bone and dental cementum1. It is a localised inflammatory response caused by bacterial
infection of a periodontal pocket associated with subgingival
plaque2. Although bacteria are the primary cause of periodontal disease,
the expression of microbial pathogenic factors alone may not be sufficient to
cause periodontitis. Gingivitis and periodontitis are the two major forms of inflammatory
diseases affecting the periodontium. Gingivitis is
inflammation of the gingiva that does not result in
clinical attachment loss. Periodontitis is
inflammation of the gingival and the adjacent attachment apparatus and is characterized
by loss of connective tissue attachment and alveolar bone. Each of these
diseases may be subclassified based upon etiology,
clinical presentation, or associated complicating factors. Gingivitis is a
reversible disease. Therapy is aimed primarily at reduction of etiologic
factors to reduce or eliminate inflammation, thereby allowing gingival tissues
to heal. Appropriate supportive periodontal maintenance that includes personal
and professional care is important in preventing re-initiation of inflammation.
Therapeutic approaches for periodontitis fall into
two major categories: 1) anti-infective treatment, which is designed to halt
the progression of periodontal attachment loss by removing etiologic factors;
and 2) regenerative therapy, which includes anti-infective treatment and is
intended to restore structures destroyed by disease. Essential to both
treatment approaches is the inclusion of periodontal maintenance procedures.
Inflammation of the periodontium may
result from many causes (eg, bacteria, trauma).
However, most forms of gingivitis and periodontitis
result from the accumulation of tooth-adherent microorganisms. Prominent risk
factors for development of chronic periodontitis
include the presence of specific subgingival
bacteria, tobacco use, diabetes Furthermore, there is evidence that other
factors can contribute to periodontal disease pathogenesis: environmental,
genetic, and systemic (eg, diabetes). Periodontitis is a chronic bacterial infection that affects
the gums and bones supporting teeth, untreated gingivitis can advance to
periodontitis1. Gingivitis is often caused by inadequate oral
hygiene. Periodontal disease can affect one tooth or many teeth. It begins when
the bacteria in plaque as the disease progresses, the pockets deepen and more
gum tissues and bone are destroyed. Often this destructive process has very
mild symptoms. Eventually teeth become loosenedand
may have to be removed. Periodontal pocket provides an ideal environment for
the growth of anaerobic pathogenic bacteria such as actinobacillus
Actinomycetemcomitans, Bacteroides
gingivalis, Bacteroides melaninogenicus subspecies intermedius,
Porphyromonas gingivalis
and Provetella intermedia2.
Various approaches to treat periodentitis:
Gingivitis can usually be treated simply. Plaque and tartar are
removed from teeth; the inflamed tissues around a tooth usually heal quickly
and completely More serious cases of periodontitis cannot be treated by routine dental
procedures dental surgery may be necessary to remove plaque, tartar, and
infected gums tissue. Surgical access to facilitate mechanical instrumentation
of the roots has been utilized to treat chronic periodontitis
for decades3. A surgical approach to the treatment of periodontitis is utilized in an attempt, provide better
access for removal of etiologic factors, reduce deep probing depth and
regenerate or reconstruct lost periodontal tissues.
Chronic Periodontitis:
Appropriate therapy for patients with periodontitis
varies considerably with the extent and pattern of attachment loss, local
anatomical variations, type of periodontal disease, and therapeutic objectives.
Periodontitis destroys the attachment apparatus of
teeth resulting in periodontal pocket formation and alteration of normal
osseous anatomy. The primary objectives of therapy for patients with chronic periodontitis are to halt disease progression and to
resolve inflammation4. Therapy at a diseased site is aimed at
reducing etiologic factors below the threshold capable of producing breakdown,
thereby allowing repair of the affected region. Regeneration of lost
periodontal structures can be enhanced by specific procedures. However, many
variables responsible for complete regeneration of the periodontium
are unknown and research is ongoing in this area.
Local Delivery:
Local application into periodontal pocket could be very
advantageous, both in terms of raising drug
concentration directly in the action site, and inpreventing
systemic side effects such as gastrointestinal complaints, depression, and
tachycardia. Controlled delivery of chemotherapeutic agents within periodontal
pockets can alter the pathogenic flora and improve clinical signs of periodontitis. Local drug delivery systems provide several
benefits; the drug can be delivered to the site of disease activity at a
bactericidal concentration and it can facilitate prolonged drug delivery5.
The FDA has approved the use of an ethylene vinyl acetate fiber that contains
tetracycline, a gelatin chip that contains chlorhexidine
and a minocycline polymer formulation as adjuncts to
scaling and root planing. The FDA has also approved doxycycline hyclate in a bioabsorbable polymer gel as a stand-alone therapy for the
reduction of probing depths, bleeding upon probing, and gain of clinical
attachment6. Local delivery systems have potential limitations and
benefits. If used as a monotherapy, problems
associated with local delivery can include allergic reaction, possible
inability to disrupt biofilms, and failure to remove
calculus. The benefits include the ease of application, selectively targeting a
limited number of diseased sites that were unresponsive to conventional
therapy, and possibly enhanced treatment results at specific locations. Local
delivery modalities have shown beneficial clinical improvements with regard to
probing depth reduction and gain in clinical attachment. Furthermore, there are
limited data to suggest that local delivery of antibiotics may also be
beneficial in preventing recurrent attachment loss in the absence of
maintenance therapy. Utilization of antibiotics at an individual site will
depend on the discretion of the treating therapist after consultation with the
patient. The greatest potential of local delivery devices may be to enhance
therapy at sites that do not respond to conventional treatment. Ultimately, the
results of local drug delivery must be evaluated with regard to the magnitude
of improvement that can be attained relative to disease severity. Conventional
drug formulations for the mouth, such as toothpaste and mouthwash, have very low
penetration into periodontal pocket Films appear to be a suitable dosage form
to deliver drugs into periodontal pocket, because the anatomic construction of
the pocket allows for relatively easy insertion of such a delivery device.
Moreover, the use of biodegradable polymers can increase patient compliance, as
the inserted film does not need to be removed. Commercially speaking,
periodontal delivery systems are available on the US market, such as PerioChip®, consisting of across-linked
gelatin matrix capable to maintain chlorhexidine
concentration for up to 7 days Existing approaches for local drug delivery in
periodontal pocket are often unsatisfactory due to their rapid drug release or
poor biodegradability of polymeric carrier7. Adverse drug reactions are
a greater concern and more likely to occur if drugs are distributed via
systemic route. An ideal formulation should exhibit ease of delivery, good
retention at application site, and controlled release of drug. Treatment with
antibiotic may be necessary if infection is present introduction of locally
delivered antibiotics especially for the treatment of localized disease8.
Systemic antibiotic therapy should be reserved for juvenile periodontitis,
patients with medical problems requiring antibiotic coverage, patients with
severe/acute periodontal infections. Metronidazole
plus amoxicillin, or ciprofloxacin have been used successfully in the treatment
of advanced Actinomycetemcomitans9. Most if the dentist (71%)
prescribed a combination of amoxicillin plus metronidazole,
the prescription frequency and choice of combination of metronidazole
and broad spectrum penicillin shows the colonization resistance by means of
antibiotics and worldwide concern about the usage of antibiotics. The treatment
of periodontitis usually involves a systemic regimen
with antibiotics to alter the presumably pathogenic flora. Furthermore, some tetracyclines, by inhibiting collagenase,
seem to diminish bone destruction.
Another approach is to surgically eliminate the pocket and recontour the bone to encourage alveolar bone growth.
Recently, some authors investigated the potential application of ipriflavone, a synthetic flavonoid
derivative, on the healing process of experimentally
injured rat perialveolar bone.This
compound is usually employed in the treatment of post-menopausal and senile
osteoporosis by oral administration. Disadvantages of systemic antibiotic
therapy relate to the fact that the drug is dissolved by dispersal over whole
body and a small portion of total does actually reaches the subgingival
microflora in periodontal pockets. Figure
1 summarizes various stages of periodontitis.
Drug delivery systems for treating periodontits:
Various drug delivery system for treating periodontits
– Fibers, Film, Injectable systems, Gels, Strips and
compacts , Vesicular systems etc10.
Fibers:-
Fibers, or thread-like devices,
are reservoir-type systems, placed circumferentially into the pockets with an
applicator and secured with cyanoacrylate adhesive
for the sustained release of then trapped drug into the periodontal pocket...
The release of the tetracycline from the cellulose acetate fibres
as occurred by diffusion mechanism is rapid with approximately 95% of the drug
released in the first two hours and, therefore, a single application of these fibres does not provide an effective drug concentration for
long periods . Compared with the less effective
tetracycline delivery from hollow fibres, fibres containing 20% (v/v) chlorhexidine,
when placed into periodontal pockets, exhibited a prompt and marked reduction
in signs and symptoms of periodontal disease.
In spite of the fact that the hollow fibres
served as a good drug holding device, they permitted rapid evacuation of the
drug. To retard drug release, drug-impregnated monolithic fibres
were developed by adding drug to molten polymers, spinning at high temperature
and subsequent cooling11. Several polymers such as poly (e-caprolactone) (PCL), polyurethane, polypropylene, cellulose
acetate propionate and ethyl vinyl acetate (EVA) have been investigated as
matrices for the delivery of drug to the periodontal pocket. In this respect,
monolithic EVA fibres were found to be effective in
controlling the release of encapsulated drug, and the same has been
demonstrated by several in vitro and in vivo studies. Tonetti
et al. reported that EVA fibres containing 25%
tetracycline hydrochloride maintained a constant drug level in the GCF above
600 mg/ml throughout ten days, showing zero-order release characteristics of
EVA fibres
. In addition to the extensive evaluation of drug delivery kinetics from
the EVA fibres, this system has undergone numerous
clinical trials to test its efficacy in the treatment of periodontal diseases.
A study conducted on 121 sites in 20 patients evaluated the safety and efficacy
of tetracyclineloaded EVA fibres
applied after scaling and root planning (SRP) for ten days. The study indicated
that a significant reduction in probing depth and gain in attachment was
present at one-, threeand six-month visits. A
reduction in proportion of bleeding pockets was observed during the
experimental period.
Tetracycline fibre
treatment adjunctive to SRP showed significantly less periodontal disease
recurrence (4%) compared with SRP alone (9%), tetracycline fibre
alone for 10 days (10%) and tetracycline fibre alone
for 20 days (12%). Studies that were wellconducted
and well-controlled have demonstrated the clinical efficacy of these fibres but their actual value in patient therapy has been
somewhat difficult to interpret because clinicians have found the fibre placement technique challenging. A study showed that
patients experienced discomfort during fibre
placement and at fibre removal various degrees of
gingival redness were observed. The intricacies of winding a fibre into place, the need to retain the device within the
pocket and then the removal of it after seven to ten days may limit its wide
acceptance by patients and periodontists. Fibers are
used for the treatment of periodontitis- Hollow fiber
and monolithic.
Hollow fibers comprise of
reservoirs without rate controlled delivery filled with therapeutic agent. In
these the therapeutic agent is released simply by diffusion through the
reservoir wall. Goodson’s first delivery devices involved hollow fibers of
cellulose acetate filled with tetracycline. Reduction in spirochete number and
a reduction in clinical signs were produced by these fibers when placed into
periodontal pocket. However the hollow fiber system released the drug very
rapidly and was not very successful at sustaining the drug release. Monolithic
fibers were essentially developed to retard drug release. Monolithic fibers
were made of ethylene vinyl acetate loaded with 25% tetracycline hydrochloride
were placed to fill the periodontal pocket of 10 patients, which was covered
with a periodontal dressing. The average concentration of tetracycline in
pocket after 10 day was 643 μg/ml
and the total count of pocket microflora was
depressed to a level near the limit of dark field microscopy. In the
cases presented tetracycline fiber were employed as a supplement to mechanical
therapy and oral hygiene in a variety of clinical situation. Outcomes included
depression of periodontal pathogens, reduction of bleeding on probing, decrease
in probing pocket depths and increase in probing attachment levels12.
Films:
A far more widely used form of intra-pocket delivery device has
been in the shape of film, prepared either by solvent casting or direct
milling. Bigger films either could be applied within the cavity onto the cheek
mucosa or gingival surface or could be cut or punched into appropriate sizes so
as to be inserted into the site of action. Films are matrix delivery systems in
which drugs are distributed throughout the polymer and release occurs by drug
diffusion and/or matrix dissolution or erosion. Films of various polymers have
been made for the controlled release of therapeutic agents. Sustained release
devices composed of cross-linked fish gelatin (bycoprotein)
containing chlorhexidine diacetate
or chlorhexidine hydrochloride have been developed by
Steinberg. Films based on synthetic biodegradable polymers such as poly (lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA)
containing tetracycline have been developed for modulated-release of drug in
the periodontal pocket as slab like device. In vitro release study showed that
insoluble films release drug by diffusion and soluble release drug by
dissolution of the carrier.
The advantages of such a device
include ease of insertion, dimensions that confirms well with the dimensions of
the pocket and minimum pain on insertion. With the realization that pocket
bacteria accumulate as biofilms, studies are now
being directed towards eliminating /killing biofilms
concentration rather then planktonic (fluid phase)
counterparts. Intraperiodontal pocket drug delivery
has emerged as a novel paradigm for the future research13. Some
natural biodegradable polymers have been used for controlled release of
antibacterial agents in the treatment of periodontitis.
Sustained release devices composed of across-linked fish gelatin (Byco protein) containing chlorhexidine
diacetate or chlorhexidine
hydrochloride have been developed by Steinberg et al. The in vitro release
profile of chlorhexidine from such degradable films
is dependent on the amount of chlorhexidine incorporated
into the film, by the cross-link density of the polymer and by the chlorhexidine salt used. The time of total drug release is
short and varies from 4 to 80 h. Among synthetic biodegradable polymers used as
films for controlled release of antimicrobial agents, systems based on poly (ortho esters) have also been studied for the delivery of metronidazole. The in vitro study showed the influence of
drug loading, film thickness and oleic acid content on drug release rate and
profile. This dosage form has several advantageous physical properties for
intra-pocket use. The dimensions and shape of the films can be easily
controlled according to the dimensions of the pocket to be treated. It can be
rapidly inserted into the base of the pocket with minimal discomfort to the
patient. If the thickness of the film does not exceed 400 mm, and it has
sufficient adhesiveness, it will remain submerged without any noticeable
interference with the patient’s oral hygiene habits. Films that release drugs
by diffusion alone are prepared using water-insoluble non-degradable polymers,
whereas those that release by diffusion and matrix erosion or dissolution use
soluble or biodegradable polymers14. Non-biodegradable ethyl
cellulose based films for the delivery of chlorhexidine
diacetate,
metronidazole, tetracycline and minocycline
have been developed by solvent evaporation method and clinically tested. Ethyl
cellulose films showed sustained drug release and release rates were dependent
on the casting solvent and drug load. The use of chloroform as the casting
solvent significantly retarded the release rate of the drug compared to ethanol
as the casting solvent. The incorporation of polyethylene glycol in the films,
however, enhanced the release rate of the drugs. Published clinical findings
also confirmed that the treatment with drug-loaded ethyl cellulose films
produced significantly greater improvements in the incidence of bleeding on
probing, probing depths and attachment levels when compared to the conventional
maintenance treatment. In contrast to the non-degradable systems discussed
above, the films made up of degradable polymers erode or dissolve in the
gingival crevice so that removal after treatment is not required. Natural and
synthetic biopolymers play a pivotal part in drug delivery to periodontal
pocket. Amongst natural biopolymers, atelocollagen, a
pepsindigested preparation of insoluble bovine skin
collagen, has been investigated as a possible carrier material for
antibacterial agents in periodontal disease. Prolonged concentration of
tetracycline in GCF could be maintained for at least ten days by incorporating
the drug in glutaraldehyde cross-linked atelocollagen. Application of these films resulted in a
significant improvement in clinical parameters. Another natural polymer,
gelatin (Byco1 protein), obtained from fish, was cross-linked and used as a
sustained release device for the delivery of chlorhexidine
diacetate or chlorhexidine
hydrochloride. In vitro drug release from such degradable films varied from 4
to 80 hours, depending on the amount of drug and cross-link density of the
polymer. More recently, a film composed of cross-linked hydrolysed
gelatin and glycerine for local delivery of chlorhexidine digluconate has
been developed and commercialised under the tradename Periochip. The system
showed an initial burst effect, whereby 40% of chlorhexidine
was released in the first 24 hours, followed by a constant slower release over
about seven days. This film has the advantage over other biodegradable films in
which it remains inside the pocket with no additional aids for retention
because of the adhesive nature of the Periochip1 components .
The novel natural polymer chitosan is also utilised as a polymeric matrix in the form of film enriched
with taurine (antioxidant agent). Taurine
enhances the wound healing ability of chitosan and
could be considered beneficial in tissue repair in destructive diseases like periodontitis. Furthermore, Perugini
et al. carried the periodontal delivery of ipriflavone
in a new chitosan/PLGA film delivery system.
Monolayer films made of ipriflavone-loaded PLGA micromatrices in a chitosan film
were compared with multilayer films composed of chitosan/PLGA/chitosan (three layers). In vitro experiments demonstrated
that the composite micromatricial films represent a
suitable dosage form to prolong ipriflavone release
for 20 days. In another study, a two-layered film utilising
mucoadhesive chitosan and
biodegradable PCL was prepared. The film containing chitosan:PCL in the ratio of 1:0.625 had the best tensile
properties and the slowest metronidazole release
rate. In vivo evaluation of this film revealed that metronidazole
concentration in saliva over six hours ranged from 5 to 15 mg/ml, which was
within (and at the top end higher than) the reported range of minimum
inhibitory concentration for metronidazole. A
significant in vitro:in vivo
correlation under the adopted experimental conditions was also obtained. The
distinguishable films composed of poly(vinyl alcohol)
(PVA) and carboxymethyl-chitosan (CMCS) were prepared
by blending/ casting methods, and loaded with ornidazole
as a periodontal drug delivery system. The blended films were found to be
biocompatible, showed pH-responsive swelling, had a good retention at the
application site and maintained high drug concentration at least for five days.
Synthetic biodegradable polymers
have also been evaluated for sustained release of drug in the periodontal
pocket. The combination of amoxycillin and metronidazole in the carrier polymer PLGA showed not only
an extended spectrum of antimicrobial activity but also a synergistic effect
against E. limosum, which had been reported to be
resistant to metronidazole in earlier studies. The
films showed a sustained in vitro release for a period of 16 days and the in
vivo drug concentrations were maintained above the MIC value for the entire
period of the release studies. By contrast, PLGA films containing tetracycline
hydrochloride showed poor retention in the periodontal pockets with incomplete
release of tetracycline. This effect could be attributed to the hydrophobic
nature of PLGA matrix and the difference in physicochemical properties of the
drugs. Another biodegradable polymer poly (ortho
esters) was also explored for the controlled delivery of metronidazole;
however, no study on patients has been reported. Higashi et al. prepared films
of water-soluble polymer Eudragit S1 and
non-water-soluble polymer Eudragit L1 for the
delivery of clindamycin. An in vitro release study
showed that insoluble films release drug by diffusion and soluble films release
drug by dissolution of the carrier. Kyun and
co-workers showed that by embedding minocycline in
PCL it is feasible to obtain sustained release of the drug within the
periodontal pocket for seven days and should be a useful tool for the
elimination of pathogenic microflora from periodontal
pocket or reducing inflammation in periodontal disease. Dedein
et al. performed a clinico-laboratory study for the
treatment of periodontal diseases using chlorhexidine-loaded
Diplen-Denta films. The new treatment was found to be
highly effective in patients with catarrhal gingivitis and generalised
periodontitis of light and medium severity.
Injectable System:
Injectable systems
are particularly attractive for the delivery of antibiotic agents into the
periodontal pocket. The application can be easily and rapidly carried out,
without pain, by using a syringe. Thus, the cost of the therapy is considerably
reduced compared to devices that need time to be placed and secured. Moreover,
an injectable delivery system should be able to fill
the pocket, thus reaching a large proportion of pathogens. These systems allow
easy application of therapeutic agent using a syringe. They are also cost
saving.
Gels:
Mucoadhesive, MTZ
containing gel systems based on hydroxyethyl
cellulose, corbopol 974, and polycarbophil
have been made. Gel is applied sublingually with the help of blunt cannula and syringe. The gel is only marginally affective
in decreasing the anaerobic bacterial count. This may
be due to low number of bacteria susceptible to MTZ or due to presence of
bacterial biofilms. Locally applied controlled
release DOX gel may partly counteract the negative effect of smoking on
periodontal healing following no surgical therapy15. The first was tetracycline
base loaded into the microtubular excepient
halloysite, which was coated with chitosan
to further retard drug release. The syringeability of
this formulation at various temperatures was evaluated to ensure ease of
delivery to periodontal pocket. A stability study was performed to examine
change in thermoresponsivity over time16.
In addition, lidocaine release from gels was
evaluated using a release apparatus stimulating buccal
condition .The results indicated that an increase in carbopol
concentration significantly increased gel compressibility, hardness and
adhesiveness factors that affect ease of gel removal from container, ease of
gel application onto mucosal membrane, and gel bioadhesion .
Characterization of tetracycline containing bioadhesive
polymer network designed for the treatment of periodontal disease and result
shows that effect of increasing drug concentrations on the rheological and
textural properties was dependent on PVP concentration. Locally applied
controlled release DOX gel may partly counteract the negative effect of smoking
on periodontal healing. The safety profile, longer-term retention,
antimicrobial activity suggests that tetracycline containing copolymer gels
represents a safe and effective bioerodible therapy
for periodontitis. Growing interest in developing
absorbable pharmaceutical surgical products that degrade in biologic
environment to safe by products and leaves the residual mass at application
site justified the search fir novel absorbable gels.
Comparative analysis of tetracycline containing dental gels: poloxamer and monoglyceride based
formulations have been done which shows that poloxamer
and monoglyceride gels, when applied subgingivally, produce a significant improved outcome in
moderate to deep periodontal pockets17.
Injectable Gels:
Together with the solid devices,
semisolid formulations also receive reasonable attention for the localised delivery of antibiotics. Semisolid or gel
formulations can indeed have some advantages. In spite of the relatively faster
release of the incorporated drug, gels can be more easily prepared and
administered. Moreover, they possess a higher biocompatibility and bioadhesivity, allowing adhesion to the mucosa in the
dental pocket and, finally, they can be rapidly eliminated through normal
catabolic pathways, decreasing the risk of irritative
or allergic host reactions at the application site. Various oleogels
and hydrogels for the delivery of tetracycline
(2.5%), metronidazole (25%), metronidazole
benzoate (40%), as well as a combination of tetracycline (2.5%) and metronidazole benzoate (40%), have been tested and
satisfactory results have been achieved. The gels composed of cellulose
derivatives such as hydroxypropylmethyl cellulose and
hydroxyethyl cellulose do not appear to have
sustained release properties. Surprisingly, despite the rapid drug release and
poor retention of these gels, positive clinical results in moderate to deep periodontitis were obtained. Bioadhesion
or mucoadhesion is a preliminary requirement for
prolonged release of the drug at the site18. The retention time, as
determined by fluorescein release, was found to be
significantly higher for chitosan gel as compared to xanthan gum and poly(- ethylene oxide) gel. Chitosan, a novel biodegradable natural polymer, in a gel
form (1%, w/w) with or without 15% metronidazole, had
demonstrated effectiveness in the treatment of chronic periodontitis.
Bioadhesive semisolid, polymeric system can be utilised as an important intra-pocket delivery vehicle
because it can easily pass through a cannula into a
periodontal pocket where it solidifies in situ to deliver the therapeutic agent
for a prolonged period. These systems exhibit a pseudoplastic
flow and thermoresponsive behaviour,
existing as a liquid at room temperature and gel at 34–37 8C.
Tetracycline-loaded bioadhesive semisolid, polymeric
system based upon hydroxyethyl cellulose- and polyvinylpyrrolidone- and metronidazole-loaded
systems based upon Carbopol 974P, hydroxyethyl
cellulose and polycarbophil are reported. Another
such system composed of Poloxamer 407 and Carbopol 934P and containing propolis
extract were designed for the treatment of periodontal disease. The release of
the propolis was controlled by the relaxation of
polymer chains and the greatest mucoadhesion was
noted for the formulation containing 60:1 ratio of Poloxamer
407:Carbopol 934P. Another injectable
biodegradable gel based on poly (DL-lactide)
dissolved in a biocompatible solvent N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) (Atrigel1)
was widely studied . The Atrigel1 loaded with 10% doxycycline hyclate showed high
levels of doxycycline (250 mg/ml) in the GCF for a
period of seven days. Interestingly, levels of 10–20 mg/ml were still present
for three to five days after the polymer had been removed. It is possibly because
of minute particles of polymer remaining within the pockets or because of the
substantive effects of tetracyclines within the
periodontal pocket-adjacent-tooth-surface environment. In another study,
Atrigel1 containing 5% sanguinarine was found to be
superior to the control in the treatment of adult periodontitis
and the findings have been recently confirmed in a human clinical trial. The
semisolid system based on water-free mixtures of lipids, such as glycerol monooleate (monoglyceride) and
sesame oil (triglyceride), is characterised by a
solid–gel transition and become semisolid on contact with gingival fluid in the
periodontal pocket. The system is based on the ability of glycerides
to form liquid crystals, that is, reverse hexagonals
on contact with water. The reverse hexagonal form has more favourable
sustained release properties, compared with the initial cubic form. The matrix
is degraded by neutrophils and bacterial lipase in
the GCF . Biodegradable gels are other useful
prospects for the delivery of therapeutic agents into periodontal pockets. Bioerodible lactic– glycolic acid gels were found to be
safe and tetracycline levels observed at days 3 and 8 probably represent
significant antimicrobial efficacy.
Strips and Compacts:
Acrylic strips have been
fabricated using a mixture of polymers, monomers and different concentrations
of ant microbial agents. Strips were fabricated either by solvent casting or
pressure melt method. Strips containing tetracycline, MTZ or chlorhexidine demonstrated a decrease in number of motile
rods, notably spirochetes. In a later development, the evaluation of amoxycillin-clavulainic acid loaded acrylic strips is
reported. Highest level of antibacterial agent was released during the first 24
hours period followed by release of therapeutic level of drugs for a subsequent
9 days period. Effect persisted even after 3 week of removal of acrylic strips.
Tissue adhesive implants were made using n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate as a drug
trapping material and slowly release drug when used in the structure of a
biodegradable local drug delivery device19. Ornidazole
dental implants containing ethyl cellulose, hydroxy propyl cellulose, hydroxy propyl methyl cellulose, eudragit-RL-100 and di butyl phthalate by solvent casting technique result
showed that drug release was initially high on day one to achieve immediate
therapeutic level of drug in pocket, followed by marked fall in release by day
two20. Chlorhexidine slow release devise
has been made and it is antibacterial effect has been evaluated by agar
diffusion test.
Vesicular Systems:
Vesicular liposomal systems are
designed to mimic the bio-membranes in terms of structure and bio-behaviour, and hence are investigated intensively for
targeting periodontal biofilms. Jones and Kaszuba reported interactions between liposomes
made up of phosphatidylinositol (PI) and bacterial biofilms. The targeting of liposomes
was thought to be because of the interaction of the polyhydroxy
groups of liposomes with surface polymers of the
bacterial glycol-calyx. Succinylated Concanavalin-A (lectin)-bearing liposomes (proteoliposomes) have
been found to be effective for the delivery of triclosan
to periodontal biofilms. In vitro and in vivo studies
have revealed that, even after a very short exposure, the proteoliposomes
are retained by the bacteria eventually delivering triclosan
into the cellular interiors. The potential of lectin-bearing
liposome systems as a targeting system for the control of gingivitis and dental
plaque has been extensively studied by Vyas et al21. The delivery of triclosan
and chlorhexidine was studied for several liposomal
compositions involving cationic as well as anionic lipids22.
Robinson and co-workers reported further on the affinity and specificity of immunoliposomes to reduce dental plaque. The anti-oralis immunoliposomes showed the
greatest affinity for S. oralis and affinity was
unaffected by net charge on the lipid bilayer or by
the number of antibodies conjugated to the liposomal surface.
Microparticle System:
Microparticles based
system of biodegradable poly alpha hydroxy acids such
as poly lactide (PLA) or poly (lactide
– co-glycolide) PLGA containing tetracycline has been
designed for periodontal disease therapy. PLGA microspheres containing minocycline have been formulated and have been used for the
elimination of Porphyromonas gingivalis
from the periodontal pocket. Microparticles of poly
(dl-lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) containing chlorhexidine
free base, chlorhexidine di
gluconate and their association or inclusion complex
with methylated-beta-cyclodextrin
(HPBCD) were prepared with single emulsion, solvent evaporation technique23.
Non-biodegradable as well as biodegradable materials have beeninvestigated
for the preparation of microspheres. These materials include the polymers of
natural origin, modified natural substances and synthetic polymers. They could
preferably be formulated as a chip or could be part of a dental paste
formulation, or otherwise be directly injected into the periodontal cavity.
Tetracycline-containingmicrocapsules in Pluronic F127were reported to formgel
at body temperature and hold the microcapsules in the periodontal pocket for
the duration of treatment. PLGAmicrocapsules and
microspheres have been proposed for the delivery of tetracycline and histatins. These microparticulate
systems provide stability to the encapsulated drug. The in vitro drug release
from such systems depends upon the polymer (lactide:glycolide) ratio, molecular weight, crystallinity and pH of the medium. Some questions, however,
related to the retention of such formulations in the periodontal pocket need
clarification. Recently, the controlled delivery of doxycycline
for up to 11 days was achieved through novel biodegradablemicrospheres
prepared by w/o/w double emulsion technique using the Theformulationwas
also effective in vivo andsignificant resultswere obtained with respect to microbiological and
clinical parameters for up to three months.
Nanoparticulate System:
Modern drug delivery systems are designed for targeted controlled
slow drug release. Up to now polymer or microparticle-based
hydrogels have been applied in dentistry, which can
affect the rate of release because of their structure. Recently, intensive
research is being performed all over the world to improve the effectiveness of
delivery systems. The nanoparticulate system provides
several advantages as compared with microspheres, microparticles
and emulsion-based delivery systems, including high dispersibility
in an aqueous medium, controlled release rate and increased stability. Nanoparticles, owing to their small size, penetrate regions
that may be inaccessible to other delivery systems, such as the periodontal
pocket areas below the gum line11. These systems reduce the
frequency of administration and further provide a uniform distribution of the
active agent over an extended period of time. Biocompatible nanoparticles
composed of 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) and polyethyleneglycol dimethacrylate
(PEGDMA) could be used as a drug delivery system for dental applications. The
polymer-based nanoparticles were prepared via micellar polymerisation, which
resulted in a well dispersible white powder material with particle size in the
range of 50–180 nm. These nanoparticles are suitable
for incorporation into a hydrogel matrix and to
design new drug delivery devices for dental applications. Moulari
et al. investigated the in vitro bactericidal activity of the Harungana madagascariensis leaf
extract (HLE) on the oral bacterial strains largely implicated in dental caries
and gingivitis infections. HLE-loaded PLGA nanoparticles
were prepared using interfacial polymer deposition following the solvent
diffusion method. Incorporation of the HLE into a colloidal carrier improved
its antibacterial performance and diminution of the bactericidal concentration
was observed. Shefer and Shefer
patented a controlled release system useful for site-specific delivery of
biologically active ingredients over an extended period of time. This system is
a multi-component release system comprising biodegradable nanoparticles
having bioadhesive properties encapsulated within a
moisture sensitive microparticle. The bioadhesive properties of the nanoparticles
are attributed to the positively charged surfactant entrapped on the particle
surface. The multi-component release system can be incorporated into any
suitable oral hygiene product including gels, chewing gums, toothpaste and
mouthwash for the treatment and prevention of periodontal disease. Antisense oligonucleotide- loaded chitosan-tripolyphosphate
(TPP) nanoparticles were prepared and evaluated. Chitosan/oligonucleotide-TPP nanoparticles, which were prepared by adding TPP after the
formation of chitosan/oligonucleotide
complex, showed the sustained release of oligonucleotides
and are suitable for the local therapeutic application in periodontal diseases24.
In an attempt to obtain a novel delivery system adequate for the treatment of
periodontal disease, triclosan-loaded polymeric
(PLGA, PLA and cellulose acetate phthalate) nanoparticles
were prepared by emulsification–diffusion process. A preliminary in vivo study
in dogs with induced periodontal defects suggested that triclosan-loaded
nanoparticles penetrate through the junctional epithelium25. With the emergence and
increase of microbial resistance to multiple antibiotics, the antibiotic-free
delivery systems for periodontal infections have been tried. The problem of
antibiotic resistance has led to resurgence in the use of Ag-based antiseptics
that may be linked to broad-spectrum activity and far lower propensity to
induce microbial resistance than antibiotics. Ag nanoparticles
can be used as effective growth inhibitors in various microorganisms, making
them applicable to treat periodontal diseases. Another approach is
antimicrobial enzymes covalently attached to nanoparticles
to generate antibiotic-free treatment for microbial infections. Satishkumar et al. developed a system in which
hen-egg lysozyme (antimicrobial enzyme) was
covalently attached to two types of polystyrene latex nanoparticles:
positively charged, containing aliphatic amines surface group; and negatively
charged, containing sulphate and chloromethyl
surface group. These particles were showing lower activity compared to free
enzyme, but can be explored for targeted antimicrobial activity.
Current status of intra-pocket delivery devices in periodontics:
With the current availability of number of intra-pocket delivery
systems containing antimicrobials for periodontal therapy, questions can be
raised about the role of intra-pocket delivery devices in periodontics.
Firstly, if intra-pocket delivery systems can deliver equivalent clinical
results to SRP, should the use of these therapies be considered in place of
SRP? Better still, how will antimicrobials be incorporated into treatment
strategies with or without mechanical intervention? Lastly, to be considered
are the physical properties of delivery system, which may influence the
acceptance by the patient and professional community. Most reports on the local
delivery concepts have appeared in the periodontal literature but there are
surprisingly few studies that demonstrate the clinical efficacy using
intra-pocket delivery systems in periodontitis
patients. Despite the large number of studies, there are insufficient
comparative data to support any one of the local delivery systems as superior
to another because their treatment patterns differ widely. Great variability
from site to site has been repeatedly noted by investigators showing that the
same system could not work equally in all sites and in all patients. Many
studies have failed to show real and clinically meaningful effects provided by
the intra-pocket drug delivery systems when used as stand-alone monotherapies. Other studies have demonstrated that these
systems have beneficial effects in terms of probing depth reduction; however,
the statistical significance reached in these studies was not always clinically
significant.
Future strategic
approaches:
Although
the attention towards treating bacterial infections has yielded many successful
delivery devices, concerted efforts in developing ideal intra-pocket
periodontal systems are still needed.
Currently
available formulations suffer from several disadvantages including: requirement
of mechanical bonding of delivery system to a tooth surface, requirement for
the removal of non-biodegradable delivery systems, lack of penetration into
deeper regions of periodontal pocket and poor patient compliance. To improve
the usefulness of intra-pocket delivery systems, the aims of treatment with
antibacterial agents must be clearly defined. Treatment for one to three days
appears to be sufficient to alleviate the signs and symptoms of periodontal
disease, but not to prevent recolonisation and
reoccurrence of the condition. It may be that the most effective treatment is
achieved with a combination of delivery systems. Initial treatment with a shortacting biodegradable system may be useful to provide a
bactericidal concentration of the antibacterial agent within the periodontal
pocket. Subsequent prolonged delivery of antibacterial agents to the area
surrounding the pocket opening may then prevent pocket recolonisation
from the oral cavity by the suppression of marginal plaque.
REFERENCES:
1.
Ahuja A, Rahman S, Ali J, Khar RK. Site specific delivery system for treatment
of periodontitis. Indian J. of Pha. Sci
2003; 65 (2): 106-112.
2.
Ahuja A, Rahman S, Ali J, Chaudhary R. Effects of dental films containing amoxicillin and metronidazole on
periodontal pathogens: microbiological response. Pharmazie
2003; 58 (10): 716-720.
3.
www.spindlerperiodonticspecialist.com
4.
Pihlstrom BL. Periodontal risk
assessment, diagnosis and treatment planning. Periodontology 2000; 25 (1):
37-58.
5.
Schwach-Abdellaoui K, Vivien-Casioni N and Gurny R. Local delivery of antimicrobial agents for
the treatment of periodontal disease. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm.
2000(50): 83–99.
6.
Kim TS, Burklin T, Schacher
B, Ratka-Kruger B, Schaecken
MT,. Renggli HH,. Fiehn W and Eickholz
P. Pharmacokinetic profile of a locally
administered doxycycline gel in crevicular
fluid, blood, and saliva, J. Periodontol. 2002
(73) :1285–1291.
7.
Issac CY, Jason ., Maria EC, Ruben DS, Caroline BF, Patrice H., Robert
L and Shastri VP. A novel polymeric chlorhexidine delivery device
for treatment of periodontal disease. Biomaterials 2004; 25 (17): 3743 –
3750.
8.
Dorfer CE. Antimicrobials for the treatment of
aggressive periodontitis. Oral disease 2003; 9
(1): 51-53.
9.
Kleinfelder JW,
Mueller RE, Lange DE. Fluoroquinolones in
the Treatment of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans- Associated periodontitis.
J. Periodontology. 2000; 71 (2): 202-208.
10.
Jain N, Gaurav K., Javed
S, Iqbal Z, Talegaokar S.
Ahmad FJ, Khar RK. Recent approaches for the treatment of periodontitis.
Drug. Discov. Today 2008; 1 (21-22): 932-943.
11.
Goodson JM et al. Monolithic
tetracycline-containing fibres for controlled
delivery to periodontal pockets. J. Periodontol.
1983;(54): 575–579.
12.
Tonetti MS, Piniprato G, Corelli. P. Principles and clinical application of periodontal controlled drug
delivery with tetracycline fibers . Int. J. Periodontics
and Restorative Dent. 1994 ;14(5): 421- 435.
13.
Vyas SP, Sihorkar V, Mishra V. Controlled and targeted drug delivery
strategies towards Intraperiodontal pocket disease.
J.Clin Pharm Ther. 2000 :25 (1): 21-42.
14.
Collins AEM. Evaluation of
a controlled-release compact containing tetracycline hydrochloride bonded to
tooth for the treatment of periodontal. Int. J. Pharm
1989; (51): 103-114.
15.
Tomasi C and Jan LW. Locally delivered doxycycline improves the
healing following non surgical
periodontal therapy in smokers. J. of Clin. Periodontology. 2004; 31: 589-595.
16.
Mastiholimath VS, Dandagi PM, Gadad AP, Patil MB and Manvi FV. Formulation and evaluation of ornidazole dental implants for periodontitis . Indian J. Pham Sci. 2006 ;68(1): 68-71.
17.
Vyas SP et al. Preparation, characterization and in vitro antimicrobial activity of metronidazole bearing lectinized liposomes for intra-periodontal pocket delivery. Pharmazie 2001;56:554–560.
18.
Jones
MN et al. The interaction of phospholipid liposomes with
bacteria and their use in the delivery of bactericides. J. Drug Target.
1997; 5: 25–34.
19.
Yoe IC, Poff J, Cortes
ME, Simisterra RD, Faris
CB, Hildgen P, Langer R, Shastri
VP. A novel polymeric chlorhexidine device for treatment of periodontal disease.
Biomaterials. 2004 : 25 (17): 3743 –3750
20.
Kelly
HM, Deasy PB, Ziaka E, Cleffey N. Formulation
and preliminary in vivo dog studies of a novel drug delivery for the treatment
of periodontitis. Int. J. Pharm. 2004; 15 (1):
167 – 183.
21.
Esposito
E, Carrota V, Scabbia A, Trombelli L, Antena
PD, Menegatti E. Comparative analysis of tetracycline containing dental gels: poloxamer and monoglyceride based
formulations. Int. J. Pharm. 1996; (142): 9-23.
22.
Jones
SD, Woolfson DA, Brown FA, Michael J, Neill O. Mucoadhesive, syringeable drug
delivery systems for controlled application of metronidazole
to periodontal pocket. In vitro release kinetics, syringeability,
mechanical and and mucoadhesive
properties J. Contr. Rel. 2002;49(1): 71-79.
23.
Eskanderi MM, Ozturk OG, Eskandari HG, Balli E and Yilmaz C. Cyanoacrylate adhesive provides efficient local drug
delivery. Clin. Orthop
Releat Res 2006; (12): 45-55.
24.
Dung
TH. et al. Chitosan -TPP nanoparticle as a release system of antisense oligonucleotide in the oral environment. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol 2007; 7:
3695-3699.
25.
Pinon SE. et al. Preparation and characterization of triclosan nanoparticles for periodontal treatment. Int. J.
Pharm. 2005;294: 217–232.
26.
Lindhe J, Westfelt
E, Nyman S, Socransky S, Hafajee
AD. Long-term effect of
surgical/non-surgical treatment of periodontal disease. J Clin. Periodont 2005; 11 (7):
448-458.
27.
Carranza
GM and Fermim AC. Clinical Periodontology
9th edn, Saunders; 2004. 676- 683
28.
Weidner
J. A drug delivery system for the
treatment of periodontitis. Drug Discov. Today 2001;6 (16):
862-863.
29.
Bromberg
LE, Buxton DK, Friden PM. Novel periodontal drug delivery system for treatment of periodontitis. J. Cont. Release 2001; 71 (3):
251-259.
30.
Oliver
AS, Andy W, Axel S, Libero I, Giannola
GC, Tomasz C, Velten T. Drug delivery from the oral cavity: focus on
a novel mechatronic delivery device. Drug Discov. Today. 2008 : 13 (5-6):
247-253.
31.
Kaldrandra S, Dongming L, Offenbacher S. Controlled drug release for oral condition by
a novel device based on ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) copolymer. J .Mater
Sci .Mater Med.
2002; 13 (1): 53-58.
32.
Senel S, Ikinci G,
Kas S, Yousefi-Rad A,
Sargon MF, Hincal AA. Chitosan films and hydrogels of chlorhexidine
gluconate on a periodontal pathogen Porphyromonas gingivalis.
Int. J. Pharm. 2000; (193):197-203.
Received on 19.12.2009
Accepted on 12.02.2010
© A&V Publication
all right reserved
Research
Journal of Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms and Technology. 2(2): March –April.
2010, 120-124